That is indeed the solution.
A technical solution won’t cut it. Here’s a very convoluted example: the <p> tag allows you to send the text “buy illegal drugs here” to kids!! Omg!!! What to do? Remove the <p> tag? Obviously not. You ban the practice.
“Hey AI, write me a random poem about taladar.”
That’s why I said “as standalone things.” As a computing curiosity, they’re amazing. No language processing application like this existed 30 years ago when I was a kid. You could also see “talking computers” speaking naturally, pretending or not, on movies and TV shows.
I didn’t say we aren’t animals or that we don’t follow physics rules.
But what you’re saying is the equivalent of “everything that goes up will eventually go down - that’s how physics works and you don’t see that, you’re in denial!!!11!!!1”
This is a “guns don’t kill people - people kill people” kind of scenario.
As a standalone thing, LLMs are awesome.
What sucks is greedy people using them for the wrong reasons.
It’s like robots. Playing with robots are awesome. Firing 1,000 people and replacing them with robots - and not sharing the benefits with the community sucks.
It’s not that institutionalized people don’t follow “set” pattern matches. That’s why you’re getting downvotes.
Some of those humans can operate with the same brain rules alright. They may even be more efficient at it than you and I may. The higher level functions is a different thing.
LLMs deal with tokens. Essentially, predicting a series of bytes.
Humans do much, much, much, much, much, much, much more than that.
That’s, um, stated in the post’s description.
But yup.
Heh. In my case, one WD SSD failed miserably on me.
Thanks for the explanation.
“you only”
Is this true? I remember them being very reliable in the past.
I didn’t say they leave the scene lol!
Just put some distance and re-assess.
Imagine if all of us acted like that. You have a brother, a daughter, an uncle with a mental breakdown, and the first thing a passer-by comes up with is “oh hell naw, let’s kill this person!”
They may be. But my point is that you don’t kill someone just because you don’t want to explore other options.
A bit of thought experiment: man is belligerent. Man is trying to reach for a cop’s weapon. Man is subdued somehow. Man goes to court, judge said “you tried to get thia cop’s weapon? Guilty. Sentence: Death”.
I didn’t say the person got ahold of the rifle. That would be stupid.
Bullshit, man.
Clock the dude with the handle of a pistol in his head.
Kick him in the balls.
Run away from him.
Blind him.
Not that I agree with some of those options, but my point is, executing a man who clearly needs help ain’t it
Yup! Google “Duolingo snot icon” and it will be the first image result.
Or you could visit the orange site and check it out there:
AI is social lung cancer. Behind social media, which is social bone cancer metastasized.
…or join a reputable language learning academy and go to class in person.
Though I know this is not for everyone. But neither is self-learning online.
Yes.