• 2 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 27th, 2025

help-circle


  • I agree. Eugenics is about harming the rights of the would-be parents. It means telling them, “You have traits we consider undesirable, so we will forcibly prevent you from having any child whatsoever.”

    To me, that’s different from parents choosing to avoid having a child with certain traits. Or not having children at all.

    If parents decide to cure a disorder in their future child, or decide to abort a pregnancy, nobody is stopping those parents from trying again. The parents themselves have not been deemed undesirable and unworthy to pass on their genes.


  • sthetic@lemmy.catoMemes@sopuli.xyzBottoms up
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m only in that category because I don’t drink coffee every day.

    When I used to drink it daily, it did nothing for me except remove my irritability and prevent a headache.

    Now, I take at least two non-coffee days between coffees. I don’t depend on coffee on any given day; I can wake up with energy and go about my life without it.

    But when I do have coffee, it has a huge effect on me. I get super caffeinated. And it tastes delicious.

    It’s Saturday morning and I still feel energized from the coffee I had at noon yesterday. I could hardly sleep. It’s kind of a problem.


  • I agree. I despise Trump. But removing a lawn and putting in hardscape, in a spot where people often gather for events, is not an insult to heritage or anything like that.

    If a president that I otherwise liked did this, I wouldn’t have a problem with it.

    It’s not as if a lawn is super environmentally valuable. And I doubt people spread picnic blankets and play Frisbee on this lawn - they put chairs on it and walk on it with heels and hold events and stuff. A hard surface is the right thing for that type of use.

    And if a future president decides to put lawn back in, they can! It’s not as blades of grass and sandy growing medium are irreplaceable.


  • “Welcome! What brings you to the homeless shelter today?”

    “Well, it’s that bench. You see, I was choosing the unhoused lifestyle, and I was fine with all the other stigma and physical discomforts, until I realized that the city wants to discourage my presence in public spaces. Fuck these armrests, I decided I’d just come to this shelter, get treatment for my addiction, get counseling for my traumatic past that fed the addiction, get an education, get a job, rent a house, save money, then buy a home instead. It’s just not worth trying to get comfy on that bench.”










  • Reminds me of JD Vance.

    Some people first glom onto left-leaning causes and opinions. They advocate for open-mindedness and human rights for all. They might even get really into the righteous purity of it all, where they get to criticize others for not being progressive enough.

    But then maybe they don’t get satisfaction out of that for long. Maybe they find that another leftist is criticizing them for their wrong-headed views. Maybe they aren’t getting enough cookies for being a feminist.

    So they switch over the right-leaning side of things. Maybe that allows them to be more openly hateful.

    Or maybe they just changed their minds.

    Honestly, I don’t know much about Rowling’s beliefs other than being a TERF. Maybe she supports all other “feminist” and anti-racist and left-leaning progressive causes. Perhaps she didn’t go all-in on the likes of Trump, the way Vance did.

    But you’d never know, since all she talks about is being anti-trans.





OSZAR »